by The Comrade » Sun Jan 27, 2013 8:47 pm
what a lame attempt at logic.
"is an informal fallacy which presents an opponent's argument as absurd, ridiculous, or in any way humorous, to the specific end of a foregone conclusion that the argument lacks any substance which would merit consideration."
in no way did i mock his argument as absurd, ridiculous, or humorous in a way that suggested it lacked any substance worth consideration. what i did say is that i hope he's really upset about it because the REPUBLICAN MAJORITY OF THE NEW YORK STATE SENATE had to vote for this measure for it to pass and then i made a comment about how i was glad it was bi-partisan.
if you're going to throw out fallacies, informal ones at that, make sure they fit.