Call it a hobby OS if you want, thats fine with me. However, Linux distros are doing what Apple pretty much flat out refuses to do and what Microsoft is too inept to do: Lightweight OS that runs well on older hardware.
Our case is we have a bunch of tablet PCs that were made circa 2005-2007 and as such, have pretty old hardware in them. Core2Duo 1.06-1.50ghz processors. 4gb ddr2 max. 40GB HDDs. Our case isn't as uncommon as you might think though. Hospitals, banks, and even convenience stores are using old computers. Why? Because the computers still work just fine for what they need it for. They aren't gaming on these computers - they are running custom software built for mostly Windows XP that barely taxes the system. Everything is working fine - why mess with success?
We don't need a blazing fast $3000 Toughbook. A $700 iPad won't work with what we need. And its largely the same for these other companies that are affected by the XP dilemma.
I've been looking for an alternative to Windows XP for the past 6 months - on and off - and have finally decided I'm going to go with Linux over anything else. Why? Firstly, we don't need a super-sleek, fancy, bulky, OS that sucks up resources like there's no tomorrow. Win8 offers us nothing but bloat and problems and has especially poor driver/WACOM support. Windows 7 isn't too bad but still rather bulky and we aren't going to use the vast majority of crap on it so its still going to cost us time as it doesn't run as efficient as XP on our tablets. Not to mention - still uses more resources than needed.
When looking for an OS that can function perfectly fine, run the apps we need, and work reliably, there's pretty much only one solution and its Linux. I don't know what MS (and Apple) have against the older market other than their thoughts that if they make a new OS that you have to update your system for, you'll just go ahead and update your system. It isn't that easy for a lot of rather large companies (such as banks and hospitals), not to mention the costs involved in such a change. Those old systems will probably have to be completely replaced which takes a lot of time and money to do, not to mention all of the changes in software and having to pay software companies to make a new, custom version of the software to work on the new OS.
Now, in some cases, virtualization does work and simply a configuration change in Win7/Win8 can be done. But not always and not always do Windows 7/8 support older hardware, which is just plain stupid. I have a digital camera that I bought in 2003 that works FINE with Windows XP, however it does not work in any Windows version after. It already worked in XP, why wouldn't it work in 7? Again, upgrades. If your camera stops working, you'll just go out and buy a new one, right?
These guys have to get past this thinking if they want to remain relevant. Well, lets be honest, its really only MS that needs to do this. Apple doesn't need to and doesn't have enough market share in the workplace to even need to worry about doing this. Plus, its not exactly cool and trendy to have software out there that would work on an 8 yr old computer and that would hurt their "cool guy" image. I'm not knocking them, its just not their market and makes no sense for them to try and get into it.
Anyways, I've seen more posts on Linux forums in the past 2 weeks from Linux newbies trying Linux distros on their old computers and it will probably continue to go up now that support for XP is offically done. Some people will be scared and just get a new computer. But others (especially the younger crowd) are more savvy and not afraid of change. Very recently, a software company I work with formatted some old laptops they had, put Lubuntu on it, and offered them free to college kids in town there. They all went super quick. I have no doubt most of those kids are going to keep Lubuntu on there because those laptops can do everything they need to for school work and will only be lacking Netflix, which isn't a huge loss anyways.
I did see where England is paying MS for another year of personal XP support as their healthcare system uses XP, so Microsoft is willing to support XP still and put patches out for it, but only for those willing to pony up the cash up front. It'll be interesting to see what everyone switches over to here in the next few months. Linux is still going to be a "hobby OS" for a while, but its gaining ground in homes and the more people can see what it can do, the more are going to wonder why in the hell they didn't switch sooner. Windows 8 and computer sales are likely to get a big boost, but I think the hate for Windows 8 is going to just increase until 8.1u1 launches. MS could just simply dominate in every aspect if they weren't so damn stupid. I'd have gladly paid $50 for a Windows Lite for each of our tablets as it would have saved me a great deal of time going through Linux distros to find the right one. Instead, MS gets nothing.