Hot!

[The Comrade]

yes gender deals with grammar. good job. it's also the outward expression of masculinity and femininity, IE gender identity. it's almost like words can have multiple meanings.

anyways, i know you're just taking the piss. you aren't truly this autistic.

[John Galt]

some people say it is, just like some people say that a man can be a "she" but this novel post modernism is something i despise. but even still such theories are on the idea that gender is "acquired" and independent of sex. even if i agree with that, the pronouns themselves describe sex of a person. it would be like calling someone an airplane to call a male a "she", at best, factually incorrect, at worst, willfully lying.

there are some cultural characteristics associated with "gender", sure. but boobs ain't one of them, dresses are. and as to why people want to be called something they are not? it's erotic fascination of themselves as something other than what they are. you know, furries.

[Tejada]

I would make a third category for folks that insist on using male pronouns for trans-gender women for purely pedantic reasons but this is actually covered under the "genuinely ignorant" category.

Someone who identifies as female asking to be called by female pronouns is impossible for you to comprehend as understanding trans-gender people has so far been outside your capacity. This is obvious because you equate a trans-gender woman asking to be called "she" to you asking to be called "Your Majesty the Magnificent."

If you're operating at that level, I don't believe anything I can say will have any impact on you. Comrade has spelled it out as best as it can be without getting into an appeal to emotion so it's up to you to find your way through to the 21st century, if you want to.

[The Comrade]

[John Galt]

[John Galt]

[The Comrade]

[John Galt]

[Tejada]

[John Galt]