Ethical question
Posted: Sat Feb 02, 2013 3:34 am
Okay, so I'm really getting tired of buying my own supplies for my chemistry class. I'm fine with purchasing pens, pencils, tissues, folders, paper, ink, and other objects that make my room functional, but affording the labs is getting expensive, and our stipends have been reduced to $70 a year. That's right, I'm supposed to devote 40% of my class time to lab experiments by using $70. What a freakin' joke. If I purchase some acetone replenishment half of that is gone. I spent $50 this semester on those little organic models because kids love playing around with them and they really do help people visualize abstract ideas.
At least with other subjects like earth science and physics I could reuse my equipment every year, but in chemistry the reagents are usually gone in 1-2 years and there's ALWAYS students breaking the delicate equipment. We've pretty much resorted to telling students that if they break anything, they buy it, even if the equipment costs over $100 (some of our balances and burners). We had 4 large Erlenmeyer flasks, and a kid just let go of the clamp during a lesson over ideal gasses (later we discovered he was drunk). $150 shattered in a moment. Who is expected to resupply? Us.
I'm wondering if it's ethical in your mind to charge students $10 as a lab fee. As far as I know, our district strongly frowns upon it, but it's not explicitly against the law nor policy. We've been trying to avoid it for years, but our budgets have shrunk considerably and science teachers now get a smaller stipend than art teacher. Like I said, chemistry is expensive. We've decided to go forward next semester with this policy. We each have about 90-100 kids and there's 4 of us; $4,000 is more preferable to $70.
I know the anti-teacher rage crowd will moan but I'm more interested in the opinion of other teachers like cc.
At least with other subjects like earth science and physics I could reuse my equipment every year, but in chemistry the reagents are usually gone in 1-2 years and there's ALWAYS students breaking the delicate equipment. We've pretty much resorted to telling students that if they break anything, they buy it, even if the equipment costs over $100 (some of our balances and burners). We had 4 large Erlenmeyer flasks, and a kid just let go of the clamp during a lesson over ideal gasses (later we discovered he was drunk). $150 shattered in a moment. Who is expected to resupply? Us.
I'm wondering if it's ethical in your mind to charge students $10 as a lab fee. As far as I know, our district strongly frowns upon it, but it's not explicitly against the law nor policy. We've been trying to avoid it for years, but our budgets have shrunk considerably and science teachers now get a smaller stipend than art teacher. Like I said, chemistry is expensive. We've decided to go forward next semester with this policy. We each have about 90-100 kids and there's 4 of us; $4,000 is more preferable to $70.
I know the anti-teacher rage crowd will moan but I'm more interested in the opinion of other teachers like cc.