Page 1 of 2
paying for a handjob isn't prostitution
Posted:
Fri Jun 28, 2013 8:32 am
by John Galt
Re: paying for a handjo isn't prostitution
Posted:
Fri Jun 28, 2013 8:37 am
by Mr.Bill
Bill Clinton was right. Bj's aren't sex..
After all these years I'm glad that is finally cleared up..
Re: paying for a handjo isn't prostitution
Posted:
Fri Jun 28, 2013 8:43 am
by John Galt
yeah, in communist china maybe bill clinton is right but what about in freedom loving america
also it was a question of if it was prostitution, not if it was "sex"
Re: paying for a handjo isn't prostitution
Posted:
Fri Jun 28, 2013 9:34 am
by eynon81
it's hard to express just how many prostitutes there were in that country.
Re: paying for a handjob isn't prostitution
Posted:
Fri Jun 28, 2013 10:33 am
by Showboat
In Dongguan even the massage at the Pullman hotel will give you a happy ending...... So I hear.
Re: paying for a handjob isn't prostitution
Posted:
Fri Jun 28, 2013 10:48 am
by Winchester
Well it is called the Pullman.
Re: paying for a handjob isn't prostitution
Posted:
Fri Jun 28, 2013 10:57 am
by Showboat
Re: paying for a handjob isn't prostitution
Posted:
Fri Jun 28, 2013 11:27 am
by Mr.Bill
Re: paying for a handjo isn't prostitution
Posted:
Fri Jun 28, 2013 3:28 pm
by The Dude
Re: paying for a handjob isn't prostitution
Posted:
Fri Jun 28, 2013 9:50 pm
by foadi