- These users thanked the author Leviathan for the post:
- The Dharma Bum
Wall Street set to pour money into Bitcoin (NY Times)
Re: Wall Street set to pour money into Bitcoin (NY Times)
by The Dharma Bum » Fri Dec 13, 2013 1:43 pm
-
The Dharma Bum - Vice President
- Posts: 11594
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 10:31 am
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 3285 times
- Been thanked: 617 times
- Political Leaning: Anarcho Communist
Re: Wall Street set to pour money into Bitcoin (NY Times)
by The Dharma Bum » Fri Dec 13, 2013 1:51 pm
-
The Dharma Bum - Vice President
- Posts: 11594
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 10:31 am
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 3285 times
- Been thanked: 617 times
- Political Leaning: Anarcho Communist
Re: Wall Street set to pour money into Bitcoin (NY Times)
by Leviathan » Fri Dec 13, 2013 1:53 pm
"The President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year..." - 50 U.S.C. § 1802
-
Leviathan - Banned
- Posts: 1105
- Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2013 11:45 am
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 260 times
- Been thanked: 142 times
- Political Leaning: Progressive
Re: Wall Street set to pour money into Bitcoin (NY Times)
by Leviathan » Fri Dec 13, 2013 1:55 pm
"The President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year..." - 50 U.S.C. § 1802
-
Leviathan - Banned
- Posts: 1105
- Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2013 11:45 am
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 260 times
- Been thanked: 142 times
- Political Leaning: Progressive
Re: Wall Street set to pour money into Bitcoin (NY Times)
by The Dharma Bum » Fri Dec 13, 2013 2:11 pm
ha ha, you're right, the two different issues kind of got conflated when the issue of the botnets came into play.
You are also right that this kind of stuff is well known. There were people saying Satoshi had hidden parts of the blockchain that had been premined etc. so rumours like this, some pretty sophisticated even, have been used to attack the concept all along and are old hat.
You are also right that this kind of stuff is well known. There were people saying Satoshi had hidden parts of the blockchain that had been premined etc. so rumours like this, some pretty sophisticated even, have been used to attack the concept all along and are old hat.
-
The Dharma Bum - Vice President
- Posts: 11594
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 10:31 am
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 3285 times
- Been thanked: 617 times
- Political Leaning: Anarcho Communist
Re: Wall Street set to pour money into Bitcoin (NY Times)
by Leviathan » Fri Dec 13, 2013 2:26 pm
"The President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year..." - 50 U.S.C. § 1802
-
Leviathan - Banned
- Posts: 1105
- Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2013 11:45 am
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 260 times
- Been thanked: 142 times
- Political Leaning: Progressive
Re: Wall Street set to pour money into Bitcoin (NY Times)
by Leviathan » Fri Dec 13, 2013 3:02 pm
The problem doesn't become worse if everyone does it, it negates any advantage of the tactic. Read your own article buddy.
BTW, I've $40 bucks today.
BTW, I've $40 bucks today.
"The President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year..." - 50 U.S.C. § 1802
-
Leviathan - Banned
- Posts: 1105
- Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2013 11:45 am
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 260 times
- Been thanked: 142 times
- Political Leaning: Progressive
Re: Wall Street set to pour money into Bitcoin (NY Times)
by exploited » Fri Dec 13, 2013 3:06 pm
Haha, dude, the entire point of selfish mining is to make more money. The more money you make, the more people join your pool. Selfish mining is a strategy to reach the threshold, which is no more than 33% of mining power.
You literally just validated the concerns raised by the Cornell professor, lmao.
You literally just validated the concerns raised by the Cornell professor, lmao.
-
exploited - Vice President
- Posts: 23035
- Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 2:32 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 2562 times
- Been thanked: 1837 times
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 138 guests