I have another question for you guys.
Let's say all the insurance companies just say "no, you have to accept BC coverage and we won't amend them. It's what we offer and that's that." After all, it's cheaper for them to provide BC than pay for unwanted pregnancies.
Do you support the gov't stepping in and forcing them to remove coverage?
Also, what if the gov't said "sure, you can provide coverage without it but then you're not eligible for health insurance tax breaks?" is this okay?
Sharia Law, Because Why Not?
Re: Sharia Law, Because Why Not?
by John Galt » Thu Mar 27, 2014 2:55 pm
no, government shouldn't force the insurance companies to modify their policies, just as they shouldn't force regular companies to provide insurance
Americans learn only from catastrophe and not from experience. -- Theodore Roosevelt
My life has become a single, ongoing revelation that I haven’t been cynical enough.
My life has become a single, ongoing revelation that I haven’t been cynical enough.
-
John Galt - Technical Admin
- Posts: 14869
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 3:22 pm
- Location: Bowling Green Massacre Survivor
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 719 times
- Been thanked: 1497 times
- Political Leaning: Classic Liberal
Re: Sharia Law, Because Why Not?
by Philly » Thu Mar 27, 2014 2:55 pm
Eynon agrees with me now 
go ahead. keep screaming "Shut The f**k Up " at me. it only makes my opinions Worse
-
Philly - Governor
- Posts: 9899
- Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2014 6:36 pm
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 975 times
- Been thanked: 1223 times
- Political Leaning: DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST
Re: Sharia Law, Because Why Not?
by Winchester » Thu Mar 27, 2014 10:43 pm
-
Winchester - Governor
- Posts: 5872
- Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 12:07 pm
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 822 times
- Been thanked: 853 times
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 76 guests