Insanity

[Dylan]

f**k man i am confused is there a metaphor involving children?

[eynon81]

SJWs are truly brain-damaged. Out in the web-a-verse the screams are all about how this clearly illustrates white privilege/racism/BLM/etc because if these guys were black they'd be dead just like all the other black kids wrongly killed by police. The fact that this is the middle of no-where, that there are no active threats completely escapes people, and that a group of Apaches have been doing largely the same thing now in Arizona for close to a year doesn't enter into anybody's thinking.


f**k sectarians putting Non on the same side as the pigs.

[Indy]

This isn't the only example of when white men take up arms and menace law enforcement, they're spared but we can't even count the examples of black men who were killed for far less.

Trying to sidestep this by saying it's SJW run amok (BTW SJW is the new, 2015 epithet to replace the "L" word) doesn't work.

Why is it so damn difficult to acknowledge what's in plain sight and has been for years? It's like your more concerned that if you do that, the "SJWs" win.

FOX News was at DEFCON 1 all day on election day 2012 because of a lone "New Black Panther" (LOL) in front of a Philly polling station, and he wasn't even armed. BLM was immediately set upon as a black "terrorist" group whose aim was to murder white cops and there was a pretty militarized response to them protesting, especially in Ferguson.

And I remember one non-SJW on another site ranting about how the Chicago protesters were "felons" who should be set upon by police because they're "thugs." What is their felony? Blocking traffic, because the poster claimed this is false imprisonment.

The problem doesn't go away if you deny it. And acknowledging the obvious doesn't make you some SJW either.

[Dylan]

Serious question (I googled but didn't find anything) - are the Apaches armed? Have they threatened violence?

[Dylan]

The apache look pretty harmless man:





Meanwhile, in Oregon they are armed to the teeth and telling other insurrectionists to bring their guns and informing police that they will use violence if the police try to enforce the law.

I think you might be wrongly conflating these two a little bit. lol.

[John Galt]

we actually can count the examples.

in 2015 of 983 fatal shootings, 36 were on unarmed black men

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics ... shootings/

that's 3.6% of all police shootings.

Of those, you can look at information about them on the site i put there...

8 had mental issues like schizophrenia and did things like attacked officers, 8 others attacked officers, 6 were from car chases, 2 tried to disarm officers, 1 reached for waistband, 1 reached into car, 1 was high on hallucinogens, and 1 "acted as if was armed". of the remaining 8 (0.8% of all shootings) there is some various causes for pause, although i'm not sure they all are real issues or not, just need more info. 1 was shot on street during warrant arrest. 1 was shot during robbery (confronted as he was leaving store). 1 was inadvertently shot by an officer when he went to taze him (oopsie!!!). 1 man was shot climbing into a hotel room (there was a call about a woman screaming and crying at the hotel). 1 was a bystander. 1 mistook cellphone for weapon. and 1 was the issue where some people say he was handcuffed but i don't think he was.

[John Galt]

[Dylan]

No. It's the threat of violence if police try to enforce the law and the possession of arms to back that threat up.

[Spider]

[Dylan]