Do you think Obama will be known as a worse POTUS than LBJ?

[eynon81]

[NAB]

To the OP, add a supporting link or this will get locked. You've been told multiple times so the next reminder will involve a warning. I'm leaving it open for now because the esteemed members of this forum have made lemonade out of lemons.

Nab

[Dylan]

you gotta sign zeus when speaking in your Moderatorial Capacity.

[The Comrade]

[eynon81]

[The Comrade]

[Spider]

Obama would have been a good 90s president. He's entirely unsuited to grinding his way through the biggest economic soaked, sagging diaper in living memory.

But he did it anyway and rocked some solid foreign policy. Better to be seen as a bit spineless than as a full retard grunting thug like his predecessor. Considering that rather than having to work with a Loyal Opposition, he's instead been faced with a borderline traitorous GOP that has quite literally existed purely to undermine his efforts to the detriment of their own country, I'd say what has actually been done counts for twice as much.

[Dylan]

That's why I think he's top 10. He did a lot with a little.

[Saz]

He had a veto proof majority for two years.

[eynon81]

his domestic policy was mostly crap. Obamacare seems to have been fairly solid, but that was 6 years ago breh.


Libya and Syria were handled poorly, but that's mostly on Hillary Clinton.


The blame the GOP game only gets so far in my book, as executive he had all kinds of authority to do stuff at home.


he's probably better than Bill Clinton, but not Bush 1. That mother had vision.