No, those are the first articles I've read on Quillette. 3/3 POCs. The very first was Coleman Hughes's work in connection with his testimony on reparations.
It does seem to give a voice to reasoned but unpopular opinions. I respect that. I also find the summary you posted of reverse racism laughably stupid, and will judge their assessment of quillette accordingly.
I will also continue to judge the merits of a speaker on his speech, not on the forum of that speaker. I dont think a mans words have validity when published in The Atlantic and lose validity when published on Quillette. This is clearly a logical stance.
Now that you have beaten the dead Quillette horse to death, did you have any thoughts on the merits of the pieces I posted? I copied and pasted them so you dont have to give a click to Quillette.