by exploited » Sat Dec 29, 2012 3:08 pm
So we both agree that the right to bear arms is not absolute. We both agree that weapon ownership can be restricted if the possibilities of ownership are too dangerous to allow. So it seems, to me, that we have put all sorts of subjective limits on the right. Do you think the rest of the population should be able to weigh in now, without being confronted with bogus absolute right arguments?