Political Crossfire Forums

No consequences because it's only a communications snafu. It doesn't help that republicans call everything under the sun a scandal so voters just tune out because they cried wolf too many times.

More pointedly, this doesn't quite corner her. Simply receiving a report doesn't indicate any ill-intention on her part. Much of the information would have to be confirmed through other sources before it could be trusted as reliable. It isn't like policy is set by a single unverified source... Unless we're talking yellow cake anyways.

I have problems with Hillary Clinton, but this isn't one of them. There were conflicting reports in a confused atmosphere after the attack. Intel isn't a science.

Benghazi? Nothing really. Embassy attacks have happened a lot under many administrations.

A liar amongst the apathetic is not that big of deal.

We will have such troubles as long as we have these parties because of ignorance of the voters. Do you really believe, that there was no specific warning about a possible attack? OH, come on.