Non's quick and dirty primer on MJ, DUIs, and Colorado.
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 7:16 pm
Funny enough I'm in the middle of a trial involving half the state troopers in Southern Colorado so I figure I'd take a little time out to discuss how Amendment 64 will affect DUIs in my glorious mountain state. Be forewarned, I left most of my brain in court today so yeah.
So, how will Amendment 64 change DUIs in Colorado? quick answer, it won't.
The only major legal difference between DUI-Alchs and DUI-MJ is that Alchs have a presumptive impairment range...basically if your BAC is over a .08 the burden is shifted and the defense has to prove that they weren't impaired. This does not exist in re MJ. They tried to work something out last year at the state capital, but nothing came of it. Defense attorneys want this presumptive range because right now most jurors assume that if they find any MJ in your blood or piss you were probably impaired.
Now...can they force you to give blood or piss in CO? not really. If you are passed out they can, but aside from that all chemical and physical (roadside) tests are "voluntary"....the " " is due to that fact that while you don't suffer any criminal sanctions if you refuse to take any test the DMV will revoke your "privilege" to drive for a year. They can do that because it's admin law, and no-one, not even the supreme court, understands admin law.
Ok, so...how can they prove that you're driving high? There is no short answer. The Police and State troopers are trained up on all the dozens and dozens indicia of intoxication, be it alch, MJ, meth, oxy, what have you. A lot of those indicia have nothing to do with a specific intoxicant but rather answer the more general question, are you f**k up?
So....how will Amendment 64 affect DUIs in Colorado? it won't.
So, how will Amendment 64 change DUIs in Colorado? quick answer, it won't.
The only major legal difference between DUI-Alchs and DUI-MJ is that Alchs have a presumptive impairment range...basically if your BAC is over a .08 the burden is shifted and the defense has to prove that they weren't impaired. This does not exist in re MJ. They tried to work something out last year at the state capital, but nothing came of it. Defense attorneys want this presumptive range because right now most jurors assume that if they find any MJ in your blood or piss you were probably impaired.
Now...can they force you to give blood or piss in CO? not really. If you are passed out they can, but aside from that all chemical and physical (roadside) tests are "voluntary"....the " " is due to that fact that while you don't suffer any criminal sanctions if you refuse to take any test the DMV will revoke your "privilege" to drive for a year. They can do that because it's admin law, and no-one, not even the supreme court, understands admin law.
Ok, so...how can they prove that you're driving high? There is no short answer. The Police and State troopers are trained up on all the dozens and dozens indicia of intoxication, be it alch, MJ, meth, oxy, what have you. A lot of those indicia have nothing to do with a specific intoxicant but rather answer the more general question, are you f**k up?
So....how will Amendment 64 affect DUIs in Colorado? it won't.