She's Almost Gone....... Forever!

[Dobby]

[Dobby]

[Mogli]

[Dobby]

[JDHURF]

[Mogli]

The Democrat Party is absolutely 80% Communist and that's going to be my next post including name and links showing their connection to the Communist Party and SDS. The public unions like AFL/CIO and SEIU have all been taken over by Communist.

Obama is a Communist as was his mother, grand parents, Frank Marshal Davis, Valerie Jarrett, Van Jones, Anita Dunn and so many others. But Obama is even worse than a Communist. He's also a eugenicist as evidenced by his appointment of his science czar John Holdren who wrote the book 'ecoscience', where he talks about adding sterilant to drinking water, forced abortion and sterilizations. Having children taken away from mothers.


But who is the troll? You offer no arguments but only 1 ad hom sentence.

Get an argument if you'd like a debate.

[JDHURF]

You don't have any arguments for me to counter argue. You have laughable assertions that were posted without any evidence or argument at all. Any psychward patient can string together a post of laughable assertions. It takes someone with some modicum of intelligence to actually form an argument.

"Obama is a communist" blah blah blah...boring. Go back to stormfront.

[lil bit]

[Hyperion]

Your main argument rests on the presumption that 'my rights end where you begins' elucidates any clear vision. For thousands of years the topic of property has been up for debate. Locke differs from Smith who differs from Marx who differs from Hegel who differs from George who differs from Mises who differs from Rothbard, etc. Disagreements arise precisely because what is right is not universally agreed upon by the graces of rational and irrational thinking.

The 'collective rights' you're referring to are simply conclusions about currently established "rights" certain individuals hold are actually a violation of other's liberty. For example Marxists argue that property acquisition for the sake of production significantly effects others and thus to privatize it is actually a violation of someone's freedom - especially since what constitutes "property right to ownership" really does come down to force. A capitalist on the other hand would argue that it's wrong for someone to homestead a property that has been vacant for years but still is owned under a purchased agreement. I'm not a Marxist, nor am I a capitalist, but these types of differences are merely disagreements over 'individual rights' and 'collective rights.' After all, as Thatcher so eloquently pointed out many years ago, there is no such thing as society. It's just the sum of individuals.

The economic robbery is so prevalent because there's no strong offensive to scare political reform. Governments that are based on partially democratic features respond to the fear of radical change. But the very message everyone should be learning about is radical reform that really avoids the Enlightenment hot button words like 'rights' in favor of how Man in the digital age should be liberated from archaic concepts like work and taxes.

[gla22]

I wouldn't call the amount of restrictions and regulations and violation of privacy collectivist measures. A lot of the populace opposes what the government is doing, however the biggest issue is money in politics and media manipulation that allows for key decision makers to act not according to the interests of Americans.