In latest military conflicts, US and Israel have condemned their enemies for using human shields. I guess it refers to a scenario where the militants operate inside a civilian populace so that once their enemies strike, it also kills civilians. but while a strike kills civilians does it imply the opposite aspect is the usage of human shields?
however in historical context who used human shields and who did not? turned into the usa using human shields at some stage in the revolutionary battle? Did the communists use human shields? What about the modern-day Syrian rebels who fight from inns and homes?
And in the case of the Palestinians, in what scenario can they function with out the usage of human shields? Can they set up a army base outdoor of Gaza in order that they're separated from the civilians?.I am working at top essay writing service. You can use this top essay writing service (http://www.essayscouncil.com) for any kind of academic writing work.
Thanks..