Political Crossfire Forums

If the press can stack a deck, they do. What's happened with that evidence suppression case?

This probably could of been posted in the thread we already have...

Outrageous propaganda. The fake and superficially hushed tone of the host is grating enough (although it creates for a hilarious counterpoint for when he begins to rage @7:50, shattering what was clearly a fraudulent air of calm, neutral, removed objectivity) let alone the premise that based upon the allegations, that were not supported with compelling evidence within the video, that Trayavon was "violent and highly sexualized" ("highly sexualized," wtf?) and pure speculation that he had purchased Arizona watermelon tea and skittles to allegedly mix in cough syrup it was okay for Zimmerman to profile Trayvon because he was black, to stalk him and ultimately shoot him to death. That is not even an argument. That is ignorant and racist propaganda.

To even imply that it is acceptable to profile, stalk and ultimately shoot a teenager to death because he or she isn't the Church Lady is the most dissagraceful, heinous nonsense you've posted yet.

Shameful.

travyon sounds like a normal teenager to me.

also

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/2 ... 54183.html

even the jury is upset with what the jury did

The attempt of some to make a kid carrying skittles who was killed on his way home anything less than a victim is pretty disgusting and petulant.

You can believe Zimmerman was right under the self-defense laws, but to make Martin out to be anything but a victim of an unfortunate incident only demonstrates the true character of those slamming him.