Political Crossfire Forums

Yeah, that's moronic and accomplishes nothing.

It's most certainly NOT moronic. I've done that kind of thing several times.

You know those automatic "pop-up" contracts that you get when you install new software? I got one of those when I handled contracts for the hospital. I noticed that it allowed the company access to certain parts of your computer. Because I was in a hospital, there were certain parts of my computer to which Federal law prohibited access by non-authorized personnel.

I contacted the company and made them change it.

Nothing wrong with receiving a contract, making changes, then submitting back to the issuer. In fact, under most state's laws, if there is any ambiguity in a contract, it is interpreted AGAINST the drafter, the assumption being that the drafter had control of the document and really meant what they wrote.

I'm just saying, I'm not amused with this new breed of anti-corportism the place has. Back when I was a lad i remember MEN, who stood up for what they believed and took action. Men like psholtz. Indy by comparison is just a lonely kid yelling on an empty playground.

psholtz would have done it.

How does this empower consumers? How does it change the banks policies, other than ensuring it never happens again?

Moronic.

The bank doesn't have software that detect changes to the contract?

I'm the one you personally threatened to fight. Oh that's not much help is it?