What exactly are you arguing, lmao?
You agree they did the right thing, so what, did you just want to rant about libruls? All I've said is that they did the right thing, which you presumably disagree with while also agreeing it was the right thing.
Jesus Christ you're dumb. Do you ever have an actual point lol?
No Duck Dynasty thread?
Re: No Duck Dynasty thread?
by Leviathan » Mon Dec 23, 2013 1:18 pm
Last edited by Leviathan on Mon Dec 23, 2013 1:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year..." - 50 U.S.C. § 1802
-
Leviathan - Banned
- Posts: 1105
- Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2013 11:45 am
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 260 times
- Been thanked: 142 times
- Political Leaning: Progressive
Re: No Duck Dynasty thread?
by Leviathan » Mon Dec 23, 2013 1:22 pm
"The President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year..." - 50 U.S.C. § 1802
-
Leviathan - Banned
- Posts: 1105
- Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2013 11:45 am
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 260 times
- Been thanked: 142 times
- Political Leaning: Progressive
Re: No Duck Dynasty thread?
by Leviathan » Mon Dec 23, 2013 1:31 pm
"The President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year..." - 50 U.S.C. § 1802
-
Leviathan - Banned
- Posts: 1105
- Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2013 11:45 am
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 260 times
- Been thanked: 142 times
- Political Leaning: Progressive
Re: No Duck Dynasty thread?
by exploited » Mon Dec 23, 2013 1:33 pm
Fallen for what? This is how the business works. Nobody argued for anything more.
-
exploited - Vice President
- Posts: 23035
- Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 2:32 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 2562 times
- Been thanked: 1837 times
Re: No Duck Dynasty thread?
by Leviathan » Mon Dec 23, 2013 1:34 pm
"The President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year..." - 50 U.S.C. § 1802
-
Leviathan - Banned
- Posts: 1105
- Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2013 11:45 am
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 260 times
- Been thanked: 142 times
- Political Leaning: Progressive
Re: No Duck Dynasty thread?
by exploited » Mon Dec 23, 2013 1:37 pm
I don't, because it is their most popular show. I'd love to see him fired personally, but from a business perspective, it makes no sense.
The best thing they can do is apologize, wait for the fury to die off, and put a muzzle on him.
The best thing they can do is apologize, wait for the fury to die off, and put a muzzle on him.
-
exploited - Vice President
- Posts: 23035
- Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 2:32 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 2562 times
- Been thanked: 1837 times
Re: No Duck Dynasty thread?
by Leviathan » Mon Dec 23, 2013 1:44 pm
"The President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year..." - 50 U.S.C. § 1802
-
Leviathan - Banned
- Posts: 1105
- Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2013 11:45 am
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 260 times
- Been thanked: 142 times
- Political Leaning: Progressive
Re: No Duck Dynasty thread?
by exploited » Mon Dec 23, 2013 1:44 pm
And for those arguing this won't harm the network...
http://www.newsninja2012.com/dynastypolls.html
The overnight ratings are in for Duck Dynasty. One week ago, DD topped all of cable’s ratings with 8.885 million viewers. Last night, they free fell down the list to 2.521 million viewers.
That is a drop of 6.364 million viewers, or 71.6%.
http://www.newsninja2012.com/dynastypolls.html
The overnight ratings are in for Duck Dynasty. One week ago, DD topped all of cable’s ratings with 8.885 million viewers. Last night, they free fell down the list to 2.521 million viewers.
That is a drop of 6.364 million viewers, or 71.6%.
-
exploited - Vice President
- Posts: 23035
- Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 2:32 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 2562 times
- Been thanked: 1837 times
Re: No Duck Dynasty thread?
by jimmyz » Mon Dec 23, 2013 1:53 pm
.
Last edited by jimmyz on Mon Jan 13, 2014 3:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
jimmyz - Governor
- Posts: 3826
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:26 pm
- Location: Arizona - A concealed and open carry state
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 425 times
- Political Leaning: Conservative
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests