by Hyperion » Sat Jan 18, 2014 7:52 pm
For a national economy to be transformative - in my view - it must be innovative. I would prefer to see an economy based on principles of democratic pluralism and mutual aid, but I will give China a nod for transcending one of the most curious examples of backwards economic thinking (Maoism) to become a force of consideration while retaining the very same roots of power.
China's economy is like an overly-complicated tool engineers designed to perform a million tasks, but it lacks any artistic or humanitarian touches. It is designed to grow, replicate, and build - at the cost of the environment, civil rights, culture, and sustainability. Like the mall fad of the 1980s.
India is more interesting to me because the diversity of backgrounds and histories is something Americans recognize all too well. Ethnic strife, various ideas about gender roles, religious friction - there's a lot of interesting parallels. Outside of certain providences, China is much more homogenous.