by Professor » Mon Jan 27, 2014 9:41 am
On one hand, I agree with you, Philly. He shouldn't be released, and he shouldn't be tortured.
However, I ask you this - what is more inhumane: a quick execution, or lifelong solitary confinement?
Being serious, here. Let's look at a situation where we all probably have some experience. Let's say you have a dog that has just attacked someone. Which is worse for the dog - to lock it into a cage with no windows for the rest of its life, with no other canine or human contact (other than when someone puts a food and water bowl into its cage), or to euthanize it?
I wasn't being pithy earlier. Our law says no "cruel and unusual" punishment. Everyone dies, so execution is not "unusual". And, if done painlessly, it's not "cruel". But, people are social beings. It is "cruel" to lock them away from others. And, we crave freedom, so it's also "unusual" to not be allowed to walk around. Even the most dictatorial regimes in history did not deny people access to each other, forbid them from leaving their houses, or forbid them from talking.
Lifelong solitary confinement is more "cruel and unusual" than execution.