i actually feel like an idiot for it taking me two days to piece this together but i just realized how completely out of it your argument is.
the west is a bunch of oligarchs and all our foreign policy and what not is to support them and the rich. what benefits the oligarchs? stability. what course of action have you continually proposed? the one of stability. what course has the west maintained? the safest most stable approach they can. this is the course that helps the oligarchs out the most, yet you think it's the right way, and claim i'm the one who wants to feed them.
so, does that mean obama, a wall street shill, is actually a progressive forward thinking leader who is bucking the oligarchs? or he is making sure that world markets remain stable as not to upset the golden apple cart?
and you had the syrupy balls to say i was experiencing cognitive dissonance?