XL Pipeline

[Professor]

Yes, I know what the citation numbers are. But, when you read a wikipedia article and post from it, you don't get to see what the articles actually say, or when they were written. With the exception of the 2 sources whose links are broken, all of the studies you cited show "short-term" effects - roughly 1-1.5 years after the spill. I'm talking about current, or "long-term" effects, which was why I posted an article from just a few months ago, which pulls from recent studies.

2011 study - http://www.sunherald.com/2011/02/21/288 ... lborn.html
2011 study - http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 34045.html
late 2011 reports - http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/featur ... 60912.html
2011 figures - http://news.yahoo.com/bp-oil-spill-horr ... 00880.html
link broken - http://www.scientificamerican.com/artic ... ing-menace
2011 study - http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/20 ... 142100.htm
2011 study - http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Ad ... ne.0042548
2012 study - http://www.nola.com/news/gulf-oil-spill ... may_h.html
- note, the conclusion was that "A study on possible effects of the 2010 BP oil spill indicates dispersants may have killed plankton . . . points toward major future effects of the spill"; which haven't happened according to my 2014 source
link no longer exists - http://health.yahoo.net/news/s/nm/us_oi ... um=twitter

[exploited]

[exploited]

A more recent source.

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/ ... -oil-spill

[Professor]

[Mr. Shaman]

[Mr. Shaman]

[Professor]

[Mr. Shaman]

[Kane]

Wtf?

[Professor]