Does the Second Amendment really have a purpose anymore?

[exploited]

[lnrw]

[exploited]

[lnrw]

On one hand, you propose that you only get what you can defend. Then you get what you have a right to.

And I'm I'm the one with cognitive issues.

right.

[The Dharma Bum]

[exploited]

[exploited]

[The Dharma Bum]

[exploited]

You aren't talking about the differences between the two, you are deliberately conflating them in order to sneak by some real shaky "logic."

A quick review: I propose to abolish the Second Amendment and replace it with something else. The Second Amendment is a legal right. You and LNRW then object on the grounds that you have certain natural rights. When I question the validity of natural rights, your response is that they are derived from deontic logic, as if simply by saying those words you have proven the concept. You then proceed to argue that because I'd like to see an Amendment changed democratically, my conception of authority is similar to theocracies (or "my enemies").

It is unadulterated nonsense. Especially considering that my Amendment would allow you to resist unlawful police violence while requiring the police to abide by all the force guidelines we do.

Worst of all, this is coming from a guy who claims to support true democracy, but apparently only when it makes the same ideological assumptions he does.

[spacemonkey]

Well, in the very unlikely event they do try to take the guns, don't get on any train ride they might offer,lol.