Israel has tried and tried and tried for a two State solution. The Palestinians don't want it.
If I were Israel I would appropriate all of Palestine and have Palestinians apply for citizenship.
Israel seizes Palestinian land for new settlements
Re: Israel seizes Palestinian land for new settlements
by Mr. Shaman » Tue Nov 04, 2014 11:13 am
-
Mr. Shaman - Senator
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: Sat Apr 19, 2014 10:22 am
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 0 time
- Been thanked: 93 times
- Political Leaning: Progressive
Re: Israel seizes Palestinian land for new settlements
by Nate501 » Tue Nov 04, 2014 3:21 pm
"I find your lack of faith disturbing."
-Darth Vader
-Darth Vader
-
Nate501 - Mayor
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2014 10:53 am
- Location: Colorado
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 32 times
- Been thanked: 23 times
- Political Leaning: Middle of the Road
Re: Israel seizes Palestinian land for new settlements
by Philly » Tue Nov 04, 2014 3:29 pm
go ahead. keep screaming "Shut The f**k Up " at me. it only makes my opinions Worse
-
Philly - Governor
- Posts: 9899
- Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2014 6:36 pm
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 975 times
- Been thanked: 1223 times
- Political Leaning: DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST
Re: Israel seizes Palestinian land for new settlements
by Homer » Wed Nov 05, 2014 10:46 am
US citizen born in Jerusalem wants Israel to be listed as birthplace, but the US (and the rest of the world) doesn't recognise Israel's claim to the city.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/n ... -east-role
Just to clarify the point I made earlier in the thread a few months ago: neither part, West or East Jerusalem, is recognized as part of the territory of Israel or the State of Palestine. Under the United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine passed by the UN in 1947, Jerusalem was envisaged to become a corpus separatum administered by the United Nations. In the war of 1948, the western part of the city was occupied by forces of the nascent state of Israel, while the eastern part was occupied by Jordan. The international community largely considers the legal status of Jerusalem to derive from the partition plan, and correspondingly refuses to recognize Israeli sovereignty over the city.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/n ... -east-role
Just to clarify the point I made earlier in the thread a few months ago: neither part, West or East Jerusalem, is recognized as part of the territory of Israel or the State of Palestine. Under the United Nations Partition Plan for Palestine passed by the UN in 1947, Jerusalem was envisaged to become a corpus separatum administered by the United Nations. In the war of 1948, the western part of the city was occupied by forces of the nascent state of Israel, while the eastern part was occupied by Jordan. The international community largely considers the legal status of Jerusalem to derive from the partition plan, and correspondingly refuses to recognize Israeli sovereignty over the city.
-
Homer - Senator
- Posts: 1137
- Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 12:55 pm
- Location: England
- Gender:
- Has thanked: 71 times
- Been thanked: 104 times
- Political Leaning: Socialist
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 161 guests