by JDHURF » Sun Mar 18, 2018 11:55 am
Some of the indigenous tribes were certainly disgustingly violent, but not all of them or even a majority of them by any means. The suggestion otherwise is part and parcel of the "cowboys vs indians" myth buttressing the colonization of the Americas by not just disgustingly violent, but literally genocidal plundering white Christian racists. White Christian society was as disgustingly violent if not more so for centuries: cutting each others heads off, bisembowling one another, burning each other at the stake, etc. and that's what they did to each other, let alone their intense and horrific violence committed to the "other."
That the only suggested example given here of global human society's violence is an organized and defined as such world war is ludicrous. The United States alone, to confine the example to only one of the state's ongoing wars, has been in a perpetual global war spanning several continents for longer than any war in its history which consists of kidnappings, torture, bombing residential centers killing scores of innocent civilians habitually and arming and supporting death squads and dictators. Even the Aztecs weren't able to with a single act, sending a drone anywhere in the in world, not only behead and/or disembowel someone, but actually shred bodies by the dozens in an instant so that they're unrecognizable.
Unless the reference to smallpox is the preposterous assumption that smallpox was willfully utilized for biological warfare then it is the most obvious non-sequitur that I've seen in a very long time. The same goes for the mention of penicillin, an antibiotic, the "arguments" being presented here are simply laughable. The debate is about war and organized human violence.