The Senate Trial of Donald J Trump for High Crimes

[Kane]

[John Galt]

[Kane]

Attacking my mistake to excuse another? That's unlike you.

[John Galt]

the "fire" was reported when the articles of impeachment was handed down from the house. it was his job to do impartial justice. he did his job.

you criticize him for trying to do the rest of his job and not just burning every bridge he had with the administration. he has repeatedly bashed trump over the years, but since he's a mormon he doesn't say things in a mean way. but whatever, apparently not good enough for kane, guy who bashed people for supporting bernie for years in favor of ultimate loser hillary clinton and now is whining that i pointed it out while he bashes someone else for not "doing enough" before, even though his f**k job on this started two weeks ago

the people bashing romney over this, regardless of reasons, fall into two camps: members of the National American Trumpian Conservative Party (the NATC Party) or russian trolls. which are you?

[Kane]

[uebermann]

[Circe]

with the Trump cult in control of Congress an impeachment was basically bound to fail, for sure with Pelosi dictating the House articles...doesn't mean Trump should be let off without even an impeachment proceeding and now Trump is the only peckerwood f**k in US history to be acquitted but with a bipartisan vote to convict. i don't liek Romney's policies and hated him in 2012, but credit where credit is due, he does have some principles, respect

[Kane]

[exploited]

Your opinion, Kane, is like if you read a news article about how a homeless junkie found and returned $100k in cash to some old widower struggling to make ends meet, and said something like "Yeah well of course you shouldn't steal. He is still a homeless junkie. Talk about setting the bar low."

[Kane]

No, it is not.