by Ben Huh » Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:57 pm
...I should make my point more clearer.
IMO restrictive gun laws have little to no effect on violent gun crimes. What has a greater impact on those crime rates are extreme poverty. Look at the map Dude put up. Four of the most gun-injury related states in teh US are in the SE, an area not exactly know for having wealthy citizens. This is the reason I state that very restrictive gun laws are pointless. If your state has a ton of poverty, which always results in higher crimes rates in general, restricting or outright banning guns is not even a band-aid on the violence issue until you attack your poverty issues. People in extreme poverty are literally in an everyday survival mode, and for those that commit violence because of that banning guns means they'll just switch to knives, etc. When in survival mode, you always adapt to survive and nothing leads me to believe that outright banning guns in poor states or areas without addressing poverty is going to do anything. The poor there will adapt to survive and find other means of committing violence.
..."if the only thing keeping a person decent is the expectation of a divine reward, then brother, that person is a piece of shit."