Huh...Religious Conservatives were right...

[PoS]

And what if a catholic couple tried to force a Muslim florist to cater to their wedding and she refused? I suppose the fascist gubmint would then put the florist in jail.

[lil bit]

[Davethulhu]

[lil bit]

[battleax86]

[lil bit]

[battleax86]

[lil bit]

1. She can't be forced to serve a gay couple for their wedding, but she can be fined for not doing it, because she's wrong to discriminate.

2. She is infringing on that gay man's right to be treated the same as any other customer she has.

3. I never post bullshit. I have to keep refuting yours. You keep using the same false argument, over and over.

4. She is refusing to serve the gay customer because of her so called religious beliefs. She is therefore inflicting her views on him.

5. You are claiming the first amendment gives people the right to discriminate in their public business because of their so called religious beliefs.It doesn't.

Either post evidence to the contrary or stop making this false claim.

6.It;'s you making the same false claims based on no evidence at all.

The constitution isn't involved ion this lawsuit. She is being sued for breaching the rights of that gay man as a consumer. Him having those rights doesn't breach anyone's constitutional rights.

7. What makes her a bigot is forcing her beliefs on her customers

8. She can practise her religion freely, as long as doing so doesn't interfere with the law.

9. She has refused to do business with a gay man.
That is discrimination based on sexual orientation.

If you have evidence to refute any of those points I've made, then please let's see it.

[John Galt]

[PoS]